Neler yeni
İslami Forum, Dini Forum, islami site, islami sohbet, radyo, islami bilgiler

İslam-tr.org'a hoş geldiniz! Hemen üye olun ve kendi konularınızı, düşüncelerinizi paylaşarak bu platforma katılın. Oturum açtıktan sonra, İslam dini, tarih ve güncel konularla ilgili paylaşımlarda bulunabilirsiniz.

Çeşitli sorular (Selefilik,Taliban,Ehli Sünnet, Suudi şeyhler vs.)

Durum
Üzgünüz bu konu cevaplar için kapatılmıştır...
E Çevrimdışı

Ehli_Kuran

Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
Selamun aleykum

1- Suudi Arabistan ülkesindeki şeyhler ve imamlar (kabe imamları mesela) çoğunluk olarak aynı (mezhep-itikat vs. olarak) görüşte midirler? Yoksa onlarda aynen bizim ülkemzide olduğu gibi çok çeşitli gruplara mı ayrılmışlardır?

2- Mesela suudi ülkesindeki meşhur şeyhlere göre örneğin taliban terörist midir? bidatçımıdır? yoksa mücahid midir?

3- Talibana göre suudi yönetimi ve şeyhleri hangi yoldadır? bidat mı sünnet mi?

4- Usame ve el kaide Sünniliğin hangi itikadındaydı? Maturidi-Eşari-Selefi...

5- Taliban grubu hangi itikatta? Maturidi-Eşari-Selefi...
 
Çay-Şakird Çevrimdışı

Çay-Şakird

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
aleykum selam bildiğim kadarıyla cevaplayayım inşallah:
1-genelde selefilik yaygın diye biliyorum,ufak şii kitleleri de var.
2-Mücahid grupları harici ilan ederler.
3-2 de dediğim aynen geçer.
4-Kendisi selefiydi diye biliyorum Allahu alem.
 
B Çevrimdışı

BirMusluman

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
taliban ebu hanife mezhebindendir el kaide selefi salihin yolunu benimser.usame ve el kaide de selefin yolunu benimser sunniden ziyade şafiyi,hanifyide,malikiyide dier lerinide severler.ama selefin yolu ahmed b.hanbelin metoduna daha yakındır.suudun en meşhurları akhimin dediği gibi mucahidlere harici derler pek azıda desteklerler,açıktan destekleyen olursa kısa bi süre için suud tarafından soruşturma başlatılır işkenceye kadar varan yola gidebilir.suud alimleri ileri gelenleri aynı itikadı paylaşır %90ı orada mektebi öğretiler hemen hemen aynıdır cami imamları nasıl aynıysa türkiyede oranın alimleri de 3asagı 5yukarı aynıdır.fakat bel'amları da çoktur,Allahın ayetlerini çok iyi gizleyenleride vardır açıkça itikadını belletip beri olduğunu söyleyenleride vardır.Allah onlara hidayet etsin..
 
M Çevrimdışı

mustafa_mardin

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
1- suudi Arabistan ülkesindeki şeyhler ve imamlar (kabe imamları mesela) çoğunluk olarak aynı (mezhep-itikat vs. olarak) görüşte midirler? Yoksa onlarda aynen bizim ülkemzide olduğu gibi çok çeşitli gruplara mı ayrılmışlardır?


nufusun büyük çoğunluğu büyük şehirlerde yaşıyor. ezici çoğunluk hanbeli. az miktarda maliki vs. de var. çölde yerleşik bedevilerin sayısı azdır. %20 civarında şii var. kuzey doğuya doğru gittikçe şii nufus artar.


2- Mesela suudi ülkesindeki meşhur şeyhlere göre örneğin taliban terörist midir? bidatçımıdır? yoksa mücahid midir?
3- Talibana göre suudi yönetimi ve şeyhleri hangi yoldadır? bidat mı sünnet mi
4- Usame ve el kaide Sünniliğin hangi itikadındaydı? Maturidi-Eşari-Selefi...
5- taliban grubu hangi itikatta? Maturidi-Eşari-Selefi...

son dört soruyu birlikte cevaplandırmak gerek.

taliban diyobendi mezhebindendir. diyobendilik hanefiliğin ana akım çizgisi. ülkeye sonradan gelen arap savaşçılar selefi inancını getirmiş olsa da talibanı besleyen medreselerde bugn de hanefi-sufi çizgide eğitim yapılmakta. talibanın üst kadroları, yönetici elitleri selefilikten --ister istemez-- az miktarda etkilenmiştir. ama tabanın dayandığı medrese ve halk diyobendidir.

suudi rejimi ile taliban arasındaki ilişki siyasi bir ilişkidir. inişli çıkışlıdır. afgan cihadı sırasında zirveye ulaşan ikili ilişkiler rusların çekilmesinden sonra kısa bir kesintiye uğrasa da 90 ların ortalarında taliban rejimini ilk tanıyan 2 ülkeden biri yine suudi arabistan olmuştur.

suudi şeyhleri talibanın mezhebi olan diyobendiliği ise sertçe eleştirir, bidatçılıkla itham eder. bu konuda çok sayıda kitap yazılmış durumda. talibanın suudi rejimi ile ilgili olumsuz bir düşüncesini bilmiyorum. zaten siyasi olarak suudilerle ters düşmek istemezler. ters düşmelerini gerektirecek bir neden de yok. islam dünyasındaki hiçbir hareket -milli görüş ve akp de dahil- suudilerle ters düşmek istemezler. çıkar ilişkisi bi şekilde devam eder. el kaideye gelince onların suudilerle ayrılığı siyasidir. siyasi ayrılıklarını meşrulaştırma adına dini söylemler oryaya atmaları inandırıcı değildir.

bu arada talibanla el kaideyi birbirine karıştırmamak gerek.
 
Çay-Şakird Çevrimdışı

Çay-Şakird

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
nufusun büyük çoğunluğu büyük şehirlerde yaşıyor. ezici çoğunluk hanbeli. az miktarda maliki vs. de var. çölde yerleşik bedevilerin sayısı azdır. %20 civarında şii var. kuzey doğuya doğru gittikçe şii nufus artar.




son dört soruyu birlikte cevaplandırmak gerek.

taliban diyobendi mezhebindendir. diyobendilik hanefiliğin ana akım çizgisi. ülkeye sonradan gelen arap savaşçılar selefi inancını getirmiş olsa da talibanı besleyen medreselerde bugn de hanefi-sufi çizgide eğitim yapılmakta. talibanın üst kadroları, yönetici elitleri selefilikten --ister istemez-- az miktarda etkilenmiştir. ama tabanın dayandığı medrese ve halk diyobendidir.

suudi rejimi ile taliban arasındaki ilişki siyasi bir ilişkidir. inişli çıkışlıdır. afgan cihadı sırasında zirveye ulaşan ikili ilişkiler rusların çekilmesinden sonra kısa bir kesintiye uğrasa da 90 ların ortalarında taliban rejimini ilk tanıyan 2 ülkeden biri yine suudi arabistan olmuştur.

suudi şeyhleri talibanın mezhebi olan diyobendiliği ise sertçe eleştirir, bidatçılıkla itham eder. bu konuda çok sayıda kitap yazılmış durumda. talibanın suudi rejimi ile ilgili olumsuz bir düşüncesini bilmiyorum. zaten siyasi olarak suudilerle ters düşmek istemezler. ters düşmelerini gerektirecek bir neden de yok. islam dünyasındaki hiçbir hareket -milli görüş ve akp de dahil- suudilerle ters düşmek istemezler. çıkar ilişkisi bi şekilde devam eder. el kaideye gelince onların suudilerle ayrılığı siyasidir. siyasi ayrılıklarını meşrulaştırma adına dini söylemler oryaya atmaları inandırıcı değildir.

bu arada talibanla el kaideyi birbirine karıştırmamak gerek.
abi taliban ve el kaide afganistanda birlikte mücadele etmiyor mu,ben öyle biliyorum?bir ayrılıkları yok sanırım.
 
M Çevrimdışı

mustafa_mardin

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
abi taliban ve el kaide afganistanda birlikte mücadele etmiyor mu,ben öyle biliyorum?bir ayrılıkları yok sanırım.

afganistanda nato'ya karşı stratejik müttefik durumundalar. ama geçmişten gelen itikadi-siyasi-fıkhi farklılıkları var tabiki. bu ayrılıkları dillendirmiyor ön plana çıkarmamayı tercih ediyorlar. el kaide = taliban demek hatalı bir tesbit olur demek istedim.
 
İZZETLİ Çevrimdışı

İZZETLİ

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
suudi şeyhleri talibanın mezhebi olan diyobendiliği ise sertçe eleştirir, bidatçılıkla itham eder. bu konuda çok sayıda kitap yazılmış durumda. talibanın suudi rejimi ile ilgili olumsuz bir düşüncesini bilmiyorum. zaten siyasi olarak suudilerle ters düşmek istemezler. ters düşmelerini gerektirecek bir neden de yok. islam dünyasındaki hiçbir hareket -milli görüş ve akp de dahil- suudilerle ters düşmek istemezler. çıkar ilişkisi bi şekilde devam eder. el kaideye gelince onların suudilerle ayrılığı siyasidir. siyasi ayrılıklarını meşrulaştırma adına dini söylemler oryaya atmaları inandırıcı değildir.

bu cümlenizden çıkan mana şumu siyasi farklılıkları olduğu için dinimi kullanıyorlar sizce dinin içinde siyaset yok mudur bu siyaset hakkı batıldan ayırmıyor mu doğal bir ayrışmayı farkı bir şekilde yorumlıyorsunuz eğer sizin düşünceniz benim anladığım gibiyse size katılmıyorum
 
K Çevrimdışı

Kozzsoy

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
Taliban hakkındadır . Aradığının cevabı olan kısmı meallendireyim... Türbeler yıkılmıyor , ziyaret serbest ve lakin o türbede biri dua edecek ya da mezardakinden bi şey isteyecek falan olursa cezası ölüm :)Alttakinden ayrı olarak Suud alimleri Talibanı kabul ediyorlar , Taibanın da oların aleyhinde bi şey dediğine rastlamadım , suud hükümeti ise başka bir konu dünyada taliban yönetimini tanıyan 3 ülkeden birisi ancak 11 eylü sonrası amerikan baskısı ile bağları koparıyor gerçi kapalı kapılar arasında ilişkiler devam ediyor inancındayım ama ...

Alttakin de ingilizce blenler bilmeyenlere çıklasın işte:)

A Witness To the Taliban Endeavour



An Interview with Shaykh Ghulaamullaah Rahmatee
(Former Deputy of Shaykh Jameel ur-Rahmaan, May Allaah have mercy upon him)

This interview was published in al-Bayaan Magazine in Arabic, no. 170, 22nd Shawwaal, 1422/January, 2002

......

Al-Bayyaan: Did you observe the Taliban's behavior in the first days after their entry into Kabul?

Shaykh Ghulaamullaah: A few months after the Taliban took power, they ordered the closing of the shrines and mausoleums and said that such things are not permitted. You may have heard of one such shrine in Mazar Sharif. It is a mausoleum built on a grave that is supposed to be the grave of 'Alee [ibn Abee Taalib] (may Allaah be pleased with him). This grave is called the Sakhee in Afghanistan. By that they mean the one who gives whatever is asked to whoever asks. Men and women, the crippled and the blind would all come to that grave in the hope that the Sakhee would fulfill their needs. There was a custom in Afghanistan that persisted until before my birth that on the first day of spring (Nowrooz) in the reign of a new king they would have to raise a flag known as the flag of the shrine of the Sakhee. The wisdom behind doing so, according to them, was that if the flag was raised and stayed up without falling over, it was sign that the state would not collapse, and if it did fall over, it was sign that the state would soon collapse. A three-day holiday would be declared every year for the occasion of raising the flag, and during it people would come to that shrine in huge crowds, the like of which can not be seen except in Makkah during Hajj. When the Taliban came and the Festival of Raising the Flag drew near, they announced that this act is not in accord with the Sharee'ah and is not permissible, that it is, in fact, opposed to Islam and would not be done from that day onward. And no one would be permitted to come to the shrine during those three days, and those days would not be taken as a holiday, and if anyone stayed away from work on those three days, he would be fired from his job. They prohibited that [act of] shirk, and that is how they acted in Kabul, and that is how they acted in the rest of Afghanistan. There were graves everywhere that were visited and worshipped, but they only allowed graves to be visited between Thuhr and 'Asr on Thursdays, and only for visits in accord with the Sharee'ah. They announced that anyone who visited a grave in order to seek help from it or to increase his provision or to seek a cure for illness or to use the person in the grave as an intermediary with Allaah, all of that is unlawful, and the person doing it was liable to imprisonment, beating or execution, if he refused to repent. This happened after they came, after Rabbani's government.

Al-Bayyaan: Did you have any personal experience with any of this? Did you see any of this with your own eyes, or is it something you only heard about?

Shaykh Ghulaamullaah: Yes, I did have a personal experience. There is a shrine in Kabul known as Shaahid Shaamsheraa, which means: The Shrine Of The King With Two Swords. It was a very well known and famous shrine. They say that this king used to fight against the enemy with two swords. When the two swords were broken, he was killed, seeking martyrdom, and he was buried there. This shrine was worshipped with all forms of worship. I personally entered into it and saw the statements of shirk and slogans of kufr written on its walls and stones. Written on the tomb in Pushtu was the following slogan: "We have no refuge and no resort and none to turn to except you," and so on. At that time I had come to Kabul and spoken to Shaykh Rabbani while Shaykh Samee'ullaah was present. I said to him, "You all have announced an Islamic government and said that this is an Islamic republic, so why don't you put an end to the centers of shirk?" Rabbani laughed and said, "Shaykh, you want an automatic Islamic government. You have to be patient." I said, "There has to be, at the very least, a committee for enjoining good and forbidding evil, for these people are dying in a state of shirk, and there has to be someone present to prevent them from these acts of shirk." He laughed and said, "The Islamic government is not going to come about in an automatic form."
But what I saw when the Taliban came is that they put an end to all of that. They took out everything from those mausoleums, locked their doors and prohibited visits to the graves except for visits that were in accord with the Sharee'ah. I came to Kabul after the word was spread around Peshawar that they were agents of America. And before coming to Afghanistan, I too used to say, "Who are these Taliban?" I used to think that they were agents of America and agents of Pakistan, and it was said about them that they were also grave worshippers and a sect of Ash'arees and Maatureedees immersed in superstitions and fantastic beliefs. All of that was before I came to Afghanistan. When I came, I did so quietly, for I was afraid that those grave worshippers would kill me. I came quietly in a taxi, and the other passengers were a man and his wife and two small children, a boy and a girl. He had a sack with him, filled with a stuffing so that it looked like a pillow. When we arrived in Kabul the man put the sack down in front of a restaurant, then his son, daughter and wife got down. I also got down and took a room in a hotel, where I spent the night. In the morning I passed by that restaurant and noticed that the sack the man had placed was still in the same place. I said to myself, "Isn't that the same bag that the man left here yesterday?" I didn't pay it much mind and said, "Maybe it is another one." Two days later I passed by the same place and there it was, still. After three days I passed by again, and it was still there. I had intended to pass by the Shamsheraa Shrine, believing that the Taliban were grave worshippers. I said, "I'll see what additional manifestations of shirk they have introduced to the shrine." When I got there I found the door locked. I had four friends with me, all of them bearded students of knowledge. I knocked on the door. An old man came and opened it up, but he appeared sad and dispirited.

Al-Bayyaan: Sorry, Shaykh, but you didn't finish telling what happened to the sack.

Shaykh Ghulaamullaah: I'll tell you the story; I haven't forgotten it; the different parts of the story are connected. When I entered the mausoleum I kept my shoes on, which is a forbidden practice [in such places], but we all entered with our shoes on, not caring, and the old man thought that we were Taliban, so he kept quiet. I entered the mausoleum and found no placards or signs or anything expressing shirk. I saw only one sign, which said, "I used to prohibit you from visiting the graves, but now visit them, for they remind one of the hereafter." And there was one other sign that said, "If anyone comes to this grave in order to take it as an intermediary with Allaah or seeking a cure from it or seeking help from it, the penalty for that is death." I was so happy and said, "By Allaah, this is what we were seeking for so long in the past." I stepped out to talk to the old caretaker. I asked him, "Where are the visitors and the old slogans and the boxes for donations in fulfillment of vows? Where did they all go?" The old man thought I was a grave worshipper saddened at what happened to the grave. He said, "Quiet! If those Taliban hear about you, they will kill you. They are Wahaabi kaafirs who have prohibited all these things." I became intensely happy, then I advised him after that. When he understood that I was of the same opinion as the Taliban, he became downcast and said, "Yes, they say the same things you are saying." I left the mausoleum and went to the marketplace. I didn't see one woman improperly dressed. Before that the Kabul I knew was a place where improperly dressed women were everywhere. When the Taliban came they prohibited all that. They also prohibited women from working in all the government offices. When they first came they announced that any woman who had been working and receiving a salary would continue to receive her salary if she stayed at home and took care of some orphans. And I saw that they prohibited songs and immorality.

I stayed in Kabul for a week, and when I decided to leave it and return [home], I went to the taxi stop where the sack had been in front of the restaurant, but I didn't find it there. While waiting for the taxi I asked the restaurant owner, "There was a sack here for a number of days. Where did it go?" He told me, "Shaykh, that sack has an amazing story to it." I asked him what it was, and he said, "That sack belonged to a man who came here from Peshawar in Pakistan. His house was in Herat. When he got down in Kabul, he forgot the sack and went on. Last night he came back and got the sack. The mouth of the sack was tied tight with a string. When he opened it, it turned out that it was full of money." I joked with him, "Where were you all that time? Were you dead or sleeping?" He said, "Shaykh, the Taliban would have arrested me. No one would dare to try that, because the Taliban keep a watch from hidden places and see who will stretch his hand out to steal what doesn't belong to him, and they cut people's hands for that." That is also something I personally observed.

When I returned to Peshawar I gave a khutbah in which I said that the Taliban were far better than those who were before them. One of my colleagues heard about that and said to me, "O Shaykh! How did you give the khutbah?" I told him, "According to the Sunnah, with the essential constituents and the praiseworthy non-essential elements as well." He said, "That's not what I meant; rather, what did you say about the Taliban?" I said, "What you have seen." He responded, "How can you say that when they are mushriks?" I said, "By Allaah, that's amazing! How are they mushriks when I saw that they have prohibited the centers of shirk and put an end to manifestations of shirk, whereas Rabbani himself raised the flag of the shrine of Mazar Sharif for the Nowrooz festival during his regime?" I said to him, "So they have succeeded in putting an end to these centers of polytheism, which you all didn't do, and you used to say that the Islamic government will not come about automatically. But when they came to power they did it. So how are they mushriks?" Then I said, "By Allaah, a person needs two basic things in this life: security, in order to live in this world, and faith, in order to live in the hereafter. These Taliban, even if it is said that there is some flaw in their faith, by Allaah, they have brought security, and we hope and expect that they will bring the proper faith as well. As for you people, you brought neither security nor the proper faith." That's what I said, and these words spread among the Muhaajireen and the Mujaahideen.

Al-Bayyaan: Did you meet any members of the Taliban movement and hear their views?

Shaykh Ghulaamullaah: Yes, I went to Afghanistan another time, and I met some of the brothers there, and found them to be good in their belief and their deeds. For example, Muhammad Rabbani, who was the prime minister until his recent death (may Allaah have mercy upon him), I met him and heard from him amazing, wonderful speech. He wanted to bring Islamic government to Afghanistan 100%. Because of that they put an end to the outward manifestations of corruption and immorality as well as all the prominent manifestations of shirk. They started with that in Qandahar itself. There was a piece of cloth there that was attributed to the Prophet r. One of the kings, by the name of Ahmad Shah Abdaali, had brought it from Bukhara and placed it there. This piece of cloth was worshipped by every form of worship: with words, bodily acts and by donations of wealth. That piece of cloth was placed on a guarded rack, beneath which was an empty place. People would go down beneath it, make tawaaf around it, touch it and rub their hands over themselves for spiritual blessings. When the Taliban took power in Qandahar they removed that piece of cloth from there and told the people, "There is no evidence that this piece of cloth really did belong to the Prophet r, but since the possibility cannot be ruled out, we will preserve it. However, it is not lawful for you to make tawaaf around it, touch it for spiritual blessings or perform salaah toward it. They prohibited all that and guarded it in a safe place.

The point is that I met some of them and found them - O my brother, as far as I could tell - to be good people. By Allaah, I never pledged allegiance to the Taliban, nor did I work for them or with them, nor did any of them come to see me here, but I say the truth, because a Muslim is obligated to speak the truth without overshooting the mark and without falling short. People with regard to the Taliban tend to either exaggerate in their favor or against them. Some say they are all pure salafees, which is wrong, while others say they are all mushriks. This last statement is, by Allaah, a lie. Based on what I have seen of the Taliban from personal contact, they fall into three categories:

The first group, which is the majority, are Hanafees who studied in Deobandi madrasahs, and they place a great emphasis on tawheed al-uloohiyyah and ar-ruboobiyyah. Regarding Allaah's names and attributes, they are Ash'arees, but not fanatically so. I discussed certain issues regarding Allaah's names and attributes with some of them. I said to them, "How can you abandon the view of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah and the view of Aboo Haneefah in 'aqeedah, yet you say you follow Aboo Haneefah in the secondary matters? Did Aboo Haneefah make mistakes in the fundamentals of the religion that you have abandoned his 'aqeedah?" They would laugh and say, "That's how our teachers taught us." One of them said, "Imaam Ibn Hajr al-'Asqalaanee, wasn't he an Ash'aree?" I answered, "Yes." He asked, "Do you consider him to be a disbeliever?" I said, "No." He said, "And Imaam an-Nawawee, wasn't he also an Ash'aree? Do you consider him to be a disbeliever?" I said, "No." What I understood from them was that they were not fanatic about those issues, nor did they call to them, and they liked the salafee methodology.

The second group, by Allaah, are salafees. One of those I know from among them is 'Abdul-Wakeel Mutawakkil, the Taliban foreign minister. He is the son of Shaykh 'Abdul Ghaffaar, and that Shaykh was killed based on an accusation that he was a Wahhabi. The communist Afghan government killed him at the airport when he returned from Hajj, saying, "You have connections with the Wahhabis." 'Abdul-Wakeel's family are salafees, and I have known them for forty years. And there are others beside. One of them, his name is 'Abdur-Raqeeb, a graduate of the Islamic University of Madeenah, his 'aqeedah is salafee. I know him personally. He was the minister of mining and industry, and there are many others like him.

The third group consists of Soofees; I don't care to name any of them, so as not to become a source of controversy and dispute, but this element is a minority. That is what I have seen of the Taliban and know about them, and this assessment and testimony are a part of my deen, by which I worship Allaah.

Al-Bayyaan: Could you shed some light on the term "Deobandi"?

Shaykh Ghulaamullaah: There is a place in India known as Deoband, which is the site of a major madrasah, founded by certain scholars who called it the Deoband Madrasah. Everyone who graduates from that madrasah is called a Deobandi. They are Hanafees, but there is a difference between them and the rest of the Hanafees. I mean, the rest of the Hanafees include the Brelvis [grave worshippers], and the Deobandis differ with them so drastically that they consider each other disbelievers. The Deobandis have a concern for tawheed al-uloohiyyah and they oppose grave worship. Most Deobandis are Maatureedees. That is the Deobandis in a nutshell. One of the graduates of Deoband is a Shaykh by the name of 'Abdul-Haqq. He has a madrasah in Peshawar called al-Madrasah al-Haqqaaniyyah, named after his [family] name. He was quite a learned scholar and taught all the major books of hadeeth. Most of the Taliban graduated from his school and schools like his. As for Mullah Omar, he is not a Deobandi nor a Hanafee, because he has a general, undetailed belief in all that Allaah's Messenger r brought from Allaah, the Blessed and Exalted. That is his belief and his 'aqeedah. However, if you asked him about issues in detail, he might not know the Ash'aree or the Maatureedee position. He used to say in his public pronouncements, "I want to establish the kind of government established by Muhammad, the Messenger of Allaah r in Madeenah, the city of purity; that is a government by the Qur'aan and the Sunnah." That's what he used to say. And he is not a scholar, but he acts according to the fatwaas of the scholars. He says, "The scholars give their fatwaas, and I implement what they decree." He is neither a Soofee nor a Deobandi, but he likes the salafee methodology, even if he doesn't know about all its details.

Al-Bayyaan: But do you think he is sincere in what he says and the positions he takes?

Shaykh Ghulaamullaah: By Allaah, my brother, he is a man of sincerity, worship and asceticism (zuhd). By Allaah, he is neither a relative of mine, nor is he related to me in any way, nor did he study with me, nor did I study with him, nor is he from my village, nor my province. He is from Ruzgan and I am from Qunduz. By Allaah, the first time I laid eyes on him, I thought to myself, "This is a Muslim who is living Islam and practicing zuhd. If his disinterest in the pleasures of this life and his fear of Allaah were distributed over a great number of people like me, it would suffice them." That is what I perceived about him. When I spoke to him, he always spoke about Allaah and supplicated him: "O Allaah…O Allaah…Allaah grant us victory…and there is no victory except from Allaah." He would keep repeating Qur'aanic aayahs such as this. And when he was faced with any difficulty, he would make a lot of salaah.

Al-Bayyaan: You have spoken to us about the positive aspects of the Taliban endeavor. How do you see the negative aspects in comparison to the positive?

Shaykh Ghulaamullaah: You know that there is no one in this era who is totally without negative points. Even in the early period of Islam, the society had its negative points. However, regarding the Taliban, their positive accomplishments and the improvements they brought are far greater and more numerous than their shortcomings. By Allaah, I have never heard of any king in Afghan history who implemented Sharee'ah as fully as the Taliban did. To stop women from dressing improperly in public is something that was practically impossible among the Afghans, especially in Kabul. No one was able to do it, but the Taliban did it, al-hamdu lillaah. And regarding the graves, by Allaah, what happened was a total change, because most Afghans are very ignorant. Maybe they will be excused because of their ignorance, but the fact remains that most of them know practically nothing [about Islam]. There is not one village in Afghanistan that does not have one grave or more that is worshipped instead of Allaah. But, al-hamdu lillaah, they were able to fight that during the period of their rule. You may have heard that when the Northern Alliance captured Mazar Sharif a journalist asked one of the caretakers of the shrine there, "How are things now? Are they better now or were they better during the reign of the Taliban?" He answered, "What are you saying, Brother? Do you know what's happened? Today is a day of celebration for us." The journalist asked, "How is that?" He said, "For many reasons. You see how we are able to enter the shrine. Those kaafirs prevented us from entering this shrine for five years. Now, al-hamdu lillaah, you see us, men and women, entering the shrine all together. Another reason is that you don't see anyone now preventing us from shaving our beards. In fact, people are lined up in crowds to have their beards shaved. Another reason: These oppressed women were imprisoned for the last five years."

Al-Bayyaan: Despite that, we can surely say that they made errors: political errors and errors in religious issues. They are not infallible. Nor do we say that they are 100% salafees.

Shaykh Ghulaamullaah: Even people who call themselves salafees and use that label for themselves have their negative points. We established a salafee organization in Kunar that had many good points, but it also had shortcomings. We had graves that were worshipped, and we were not able to get rid of the practice entirely. There was drug dealing going on amongst us, and we were not able to stop it. Some of the scholars among us smoke cigarettes. So you can't say that an Islamic government will be able to get rid of all negative practices. Perfection didn't occur even in the era of the Prophet r, so how are the Taliban going to achieve it at the end of the Twentieth Century CE?

Al-Bayyaan: The international media is promoting the idea that the Afghan people hated the Taliban rule and that it was imposed upon them against their will. One of the major leaders of the Northern Alliance characterized the Taliban rule as a nightmare for the Afghan people. What's your comment on that?

Shaykh Ghulaamullaah: This statement is correct from a certain angle, and incorrect from another angle. For example, those who were forced to leave their beards unshaved out of fear were not pleased with the Taliban, nor were women who liked to come out of their houses with their bodies exposed. Likewise, those accustomed to drinking alcohol and the communists did not support them. As for the average people, they loved the Taliban. The majority were pleased with them.

I'll tell you this: Mullah Omar gathered the people after three days of continual bombing and said to them, "O people! If you are tired of this bombing, [you should know that] it's going to increase in severity many times over what you have already seen. If you've had enough of it, I will turn myself over to that kaafir tyrant, Bush, so that you be spared this tribulation and bombing." The people responded with one voice, "No. By Allaah, as long as a single man of us remains, we will not abandon our resistance to America." That is the feeling of the people in general. And the opinion of the people of corruption, immorality and grave worship is of no consequence.

Al-Bayyaan: A criticism that some have made of the Taliban is that no one from the other ethnic groups besides the Pushtuns played any role in their government. What is your view on this issue?

Shaykh Ghulaamullaah: This claim is made by those who either don't know what is happening in Afghanistan and don't know anything about the Taliban or by those who are diehard opponents of the Taliban and simply want to defame them. The Taliban are composed of Muslims from all the ethnic groups in Afghanistan. Yes, the majority of them are Pushtuns, because Pushtuns make up 65% of the population of Afghanistan, so, naturally, there will be more Pushtuns [among them]. If they say that a majority of them are Pushtuns, that is correct, but if they say there is no one but Pushtuns among their leadership, that is an unadulterated lie.

Al-Bayyaan: People have been dismayed at the Taliban's continual retreats since they first pulled out of Mazar Sharif, then Kabul, then Herat and Qunduz and elsewhere. The international media interpret this as weakness, surrender and defeat. Is there another explanation beside the mainstream interpretation?

Shaykh Ghulaamullaah: There is no weakness in that, because no real fighting took place between them and the Northern Alliance so that it could be said they expelled them. They left based on their own decision, which left [the Northern Alliance] and America bewildered, wondering, "Where are the Taliban? Where have they hidden?" It is true that some of them were killed and injured, but some of their enemy were killed as well. However the Taliban no longer have any media to explain the reality. The media that are disseminating information now are all the enemies of the Taliban and enemies of the Muslims. There is one matter that is clear to both the enemies and the friends of the Taliban, that when you hear something from them, they don't lie, whereas their enemies lie.

Al-Bayyaan: We would like to thank Shaykh Ghulaamullaah for responding to our invitation to this discussion. And we ask Allaah to accept from him and from us our sincere deeds and truthful statements.
 
M Çevrimdışı

mustafa_mardin

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
siyasi farklılıkları olduğu için dinimi kullanıyorlar

"dini kullanıyorlar" demeyelim. şöyle diyebiliriz. el kaide suudilerin uzun yıllardır takip ettikleri amerikan yanlısı maslahatçı politikaları tasvip etmiyor ve bu muhalefetlerini meşrulaştırma adına akidevi konularda bazı farklı söylemleri benimsiyor ayrılığı daha da derinleştiriyorlar.


yoksa ki bugün isim ve sıfat tevhidi konusunda olsun namazın nasıl kılınacağı konusunda olsun nikah talak gibi meselelerde olsun el-kaidenin bağımsız bir fıkıh komisyonu fetva mercii yok. olmasına da gerek yok. onlar da suudi şeyhlerine tabi olmuş durumdalar.
 
İZZETLİ Çevrimdışı

İZZETLİ

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
yani dine uygun tarflarını almışlar sapkın tarflarına muhalefet ediyorlar demek istiyorsunuz zaten olması gerkende budur Allah cc onlardan razı olsun
 
portalkal Çevrimdışı

portalkal

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
abi asıl sorun şu bence,selefi hareketin 1001 tane yönelimi var,siyaseti kabul edeni,etmeyeni,tasavvufu reddedeni,kabul edeni,yani bence kaynak kuran ve sünnet ile,teymiyye gibi alimlerin görüşleri temel alınırsa herhangi bir problem kalmayacak,adama hadis bildirirsin,aslı yok der zayıf der,o sundugunda kanıtlasan aslı olmadığını,şeyhim diyor der aynı yazıdaki gibi ,Allah bu ümmete uyanmayı nasip etsin sadece
 
K Çevrimdışı

Kozzsoy

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
Bu da yine bir Suudi Şeyhine aynı türden gelen bir soru Taliban islamimi değilmi olarak .. Cevap kısaca Evet İslami ve bizler onlar için dua etmeliyiz oluyor .
http://www.islamicline.com/islamicb...iban_and_Afghanistan(www.islamicline.com).pdf

Fatwa of Sheikh Hamoud al-'Uqlaa' on Taliban and Afghanistan
Sheikh Hammoud Al-Uqlaa' Ash-Shuaibi is one of the senior-most and leading scholars in the Arabian Peninsula. He lives in the city of Buraydah in the Qaseem region of the Arabian Peninsula and is currently in his mid-eighties. He is one of the many teachers of Sheikh Salman Al-Awdah (also from Buraydah, who was imprisoned by the Saudi Regime from 1994 to 1999) and is well-known for speaking the Truth under all circumstances. May Allah protect him.

This fatwa was issued by the Sheikh on 2 Ramadan 1421 AH/ 29 November 2000 in response to American threats to impose new sanctions against the Taliban for their failure to curb 'terrorism'.
In the Name of Allah the Most Merciful the Most Kind

Fatwa on the Shariah Implementation of the Taliban Government in Afghanistan
by His Excellency, Sheikh Hammoud bin Uqlaa' Ash-Shuaibi
2nd Ramadan, 1421 Hijri/ 29 November 2000 Al-Qaseem, Arabian Peninsula

Question: "Some people hold doubts about the Shariah implementation of the Taliban Government in Afghanistan. What is the reality regarding this government? We request from you a comprehensive answer backed up by evidences. May Allah protect you."

Answer:

Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds, and Peace and Blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, upon his family and his companions altogether. As for what follows:

Indeed to determine the implementation or rejection of Shariah by a country depends on a number of factors:

Firstly:

Its legislation by the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger (SAWS) in all the branches of ruling and other than it in other worldly dealings.

Secondly:

Indeed one of the most important components of a country is its control of land. It is well-known that the Taliban Government has over 95% of Afghanistan under its control.

Thirdly:

That its relations and dealings with other countries are established on the basis of the Noble Deen.

The Taliban Regime in Afghanistan has been proven to fulfil these factors, so it is the only country in the World in which there are no man-made laws and legislations. Rather, indeed its legislation is established on the Shariah of Allah and His Messenger in the Courts of Law, in the ministries, in the governmental circles and in other establishments.

As for the Muslim countries other than Afghanistan, amongst them are those which legislate with man-made laws in their totality and amongst them are those who contain Courts of Law which are man-made in their totality, but under the label of the Shariah of Allah and His Messenger (SAWS). Even the vast proportion of the rulings in the so-called 'Shariah' Courts in these countries are based on man-made institutions and legislative acts, so in reality there is no difference between this type of ruling and the ruling of man-made laws except by name.

Amongst the evidences that the Taliban Government is a Shariah Government is the fact that the disbelieving countries who are enemies of Islam and the Muslims are hostile towards it, have imposed an economic boycott on it, isolated it and tightened their grips on it for no reason other than its adherence to the Deen of Islam.

Furthermore, military strikes are about to be carried out on Afghanistan just like America attacked it with Cruise Missiles in 1998. At the same time, these same disbelieving countries continue to support the Opposition Northern Alliance (of Ahmad Shah Masood) with funds, weapons and advisors. This itself is clear evidence on the Shariah implementation of the Taliban Government and that they are upon Truth in their fighting against the Northern Alliance. In addition, the failure of the disbelieving nations to recognise the Taliban Regime as a nation and a government further removes any doubt in the Shariah implementation of the Taliban Government.

Amongst other reasons that point to the fact the Taliban Government is a Shariah Government is the fact that it fulfils certain criteria as mentioned earlier, with the exception that it is in urgent need of financial assistance due to its limited financial resources. Therefore we appeal to our Muslim brothers and sisters around the World to assist it with financial and material means and to support it with their media capabilities because the enemies of Islam and their agents have deceived and misguided most of the people until they have become confused as to whether this is a Muslim Government or not.

At this time, the Taliban Regime remains in a state of warfare against its opposition, the Northern Alliance, so Jihad with it is ordained by the Shariah because Jihad with the Taliban is against the Northern Alliance which is being funded by the forces of Disbelief like America, Britain and Russia and others who are calling for a broad-based government in Afghanistan established upon a Western legislative system. Since the situation is like this, then indeed it is obligatory to assist the Taliban Regime and to make Jihad with it in order to bring victory to Islam and in order to cooperate upon all acts of piety and fear of Allah, as Allah (SWT) says in the Quran:

"And cooperate with one another in all acts of piety and the fear of Allah" [Quran 5:2].

In addition, the Messenger of Allah (SAWS) said: "The similitude of the believers in their mutual love, mutual feelings and mutual relations is like a single body: if one part of it is in pain, the entire body feels discomfort." He also said (SAWS): "A Muslim and his fellow Muslim is like a building, one part of which supports the other (whilst interlocking his fingers)."

And from the greatest qualities further proving the validity of the Muslim Taliban Government are:

Its efforts to support the Mujahideen and defend them against their enemies. This has been witnessed in this government. It does not contain any forms of media which are forbidden in the Shariah. Indeed it is adamant, sincere and honest in its efforts to implement Shariah from its establishment of the Islamic Penal Code (hudood) to forbidding open acts of disobedience to Allah and His Messenger, meting out suitable punishments for them and Islamicising education and media. Indeed it is the only country in the World which is striving for women's rights according to the Shariah and not according to the ways of the Secularists who encourage the women to display their beauty, cast off their hijabs, mix freely with men, drive cars alone and other things like that. It is the only country in the World which has a separate ministry by the name of the Ministry to Encourage Good and Forbid Evil.


To conclude

Just as we pray for the Taliban Government for ability and guidance from Allah, we also appeal to them to remain firm and steadfast upon these aforementioned great Islamic qualities and to hold fast to the Book of Allah (SWT), the Sunnah of His Messenger (SAWS) and the ways of the Salaf-us-Saalih (Pious Predecessors) and that they do not worry about pressure and intimidation from the disbelieving countries and others like them. Allah (SWT) says in the Quran:

"And whosoever fears Allah, He will make for him a way out (from every difficulty) and provide for him from where he could never have imagined" [Quran 65:2-3]

and "And whosover fears Allah, He will provide for him a solution to all his affairs" [Quran 65:4]

and "And the end will belong to the Allah-Fearing" [Quran 7:128].

For them is an example in the Messenger of Allah (SAWS) and the Muslims with him when they were boycotted by the Quraish to the valley on the outskirts of Makkah in an attempt to prevent them from establishing Allah's Deen, but the end belonged to the Allah-Fearing. We also appeal to the other Muslim countries to follow in the footsteps of the Taliban in the implementation of Shariah in respect to all worldy dealings in judgements, media, economics, internal and foreign politics, women's affairs and education and that they do not blindly follow the West in its anti-Islamic and misguided ways and policies.

And all ability is from Allah (SWT) and peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family and companions altogether.


Written by the Sheikh, the Teacher
Hammoud bin Uqlaa' Ash-Shuaibi
2nd Ramadan, 1421 Hijri/ 29 November 2000 Al-Qaseem, Arabian Peninsula
 
M Çevrimdışı

mustafa_mardin

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
abi asıl sorun şu bence,selefi hareketin 1001 tane yönelimi var,siyaseti kabul edeni,etmeyeni,tasavvufu reddedeni,kabul edeni,yani bence kaynak kuran ve sünnet ile,teymiyye gibi alimlerin görüşleri temel alınırsa herhangi bir problem kalmayacak,adama hadis bildirirsin,aslı yok der zayıf der,o sundugunda kanıtlasan aslı olmadığını,şeyhim diyor der aynı yazıdaki gibi ,Allah bu ümmete uyanmayı nasip etsin sadece

doğru.

selefilik de tıpkı ehli sünnet kelimesi gibi paylaşılamayan sihirli bi kelime adeta. selefilik nedir, hangi selefilik, kime göre neye göre. kafalar karışık.

mustafa islamoğlunu abdulaziz bayındırı selefi zannedenler bile var.
 
Çay-Şakird Çevrimdışı

Çay-Şakird

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
aklıma bir soru takıldı kardeşler,taliban abd ye karşı savaşmıyor mu?bunlar nasıl böyle diyebiliyorlar,el kaide ve şehid usame bin ladinin hareketinin suudi yönetimini kabul etmemsinin sebeplerinden birisi de abd ile yönetimin dostluğuydu.
 
K Çevrimdışı

Kozzsoy

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
Şincik yukardaki mesajlarımı okuduğunu varsayarak tek tek sorulara gelirsek

Selamun aleykum

1- Suudi Arabistan ülkesindeki şeyhler ve imamlar (kabe imamları mesela) çoğunluk olarak aynı (mezhep-itikat vs. olarak) görüşte midirler? Yoksa onlarda aynen bizim ülkemzide olduğu gibi çok çeşitli gruplara mı ayrılmışlardır?

Ayrılıktan kastına bakar ,,, zaten suud rejminden ayrılan bir imamın orada barınması biraz zor olur değil mi :) ?

2- Mesela suudi ülkesindeki meşhur şeyhlere göre örneğin taliban terörist midir? bidatçımıdır? yoksa mücahid midir?

11 eylüle dek taliban rejimi islami kabul edilmiş daha sonra abd ile ilişkiler gereği Suud Taliban ilişkileri kesilmiş ama muhtemelen kapalı kapılar ardında da devam etmiştir... Zaten yukardaki fetvaları ve orada yaşananları gözleri ile görenlerin açıklamaları ışığında ayrılık gerektirecek pek de bir durum yok ....

3- Talibana göre suudi yönetimi ve şeyhleri hangi yoldadır? bidat mı sünnet mi?

Talibanın derdi şu anda bambaşka ,,,,,

4- Usame ve el kaide Sünniliğin hangi itikadındaydı? Maturidi-Eşari-Selefi...

Selefi ,,,

5- Taliban grubu hangi itikatta? Maturidi-Eşari-Selefi...

Homojen değil ancak köken olarak maturidi ve eşari denlebilir ancak burada maturidi ya da eşari yanılmaz diye iddiaları bulunmuyor , yani bizdeki tarikat şeyhlerine dilim varmıyor ama tapınma derecesinde iman etme ya da inanma gibi bir durum söz konusu değil yanlış varsa gösterilirse vazgeçebiliyorlar .....
 
portalkal Çevrimdışı

portalkal

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
şimdi,ben hiç bir kimseye su-i zan beslemiyorum ama,bu ülkede 1900'lü yıllarda müslüman olmayan,mason olan,imamların selatin camilerinde cemaate namaz kıldırdığına dair kayıtlar dahi varken,müslümanlara kahraman olarak sunulan,kafirlerin de düşman olarak takdim ettiği şahıslara hep dua etmişimdir.fakat mensubu olduğumuz din o kadar güzelki hiç kimseye sui zan etmemiştir bu zamana kadar genel olarak,osmanlıya prenses yollarlar,cariye olarak alır bilmezki casus,afganistan da rus savaşında amerikalılarla işbirliği yapar,bilmezlerki işin içinde bin oyun döner,bence eğer bu zamanı ahir zaman olarak kabul edeceksek,en başta zihnimize yerleştireceğimiz düşünce,kuran ve sünnet haricinde ve güvenilir alimler haricinde herkese şüphe ve sui zan ile yaklaşılmalıdır. çünkü arap şeyhlerini kadınlarla kandırırlar,bizim milleti,amerika da yaşa vaadiyle,iranlıları sözde şia şeriatı ve israili vuracağız kıracağız yalanlarıyla ümmeti mahvettiler.ehli sünnet mensupları olarak gelecek 10-20 yılda aslına dönüş yaşamazsak,çok büyük şeyler kaybedeceğiz,çünkü sanal haçlı saldırıları hiç olmadığı kadar yoğunlaşmış vaziyette..
 
M Çevrimdışı

mustafa_mardin

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
aklıma bir soru takıldı kardeşler,taliban abd ye karşı savaşmıyor mu?bunlar nasıl böyle diyebiliyorlar,

taliban bugün savaşıyor ama yarın savaşmayabilir. yani illa savaşmalıyız diye mutlak bir görüşleri, katı bir taassupları yok. amerika bize saldırdı biz de kendimizi savunuyoruz diyorlar. şu an bile ara ara amerikan gizli servisi ile görüştüklerini diplomatik amaçlı temaslarda bulunduklarını biliyoruz.

çok değil 90 larda uzun yıllar boyu savaşmadığı bir dönem de vardı. amerika afganistanda taliban rejimi hem siyasal istikrarı ve güvenliği sağlıyor, hem de rus yanlısı kuzey ittifakına barikat oluyor diye talibanı kolluyor destekliyordu. şeyh ladin talibana sığındı onlar da biz evimize buyur ettiğimiz misafirimizi veremeyiz dediler. iş bu noktaya geldi.


el kaide ve şehid usame bin ladinin hareketinin suudi yönetimini kabul etmemsinin sebeplerinden birisi de abd ile yönetimin dostluğuydu.

talibanla el kaideyi farklı kılan şey temelde şu. el kaide varlığını amerikan karşıtlığı üzerine oturtmuş durumda. taliban böyle bir şeye gerek duymuyor. amerikadan önce de yüzlerce yıldur o coğrafyada diyobendi medreseleri vardı. el-kaide arap yarımadasında suudi hanedanını kabul etmiyor. bu doğru. ama talibanın böyle bir düşüncesi yok.
 
K Çevrimdışı

Kozzsoy

İyi Bilinen Üye
İslam-TR Üyesi
Ha bu arada ek bilgi olarak Abdülhamid döneminde de taliban-el kade benzeri bir ittifak söz konusudur , özellikle Afganinin dostu olan Blunt masonu falan bu ittifaktann oldukça rahatsız olmuştur ve abdülhamid hiç bir osmanlı sultanının başaramadığını başşarmakta olmadık yerlerde adıa hutbe okunmaya başlanmış durumda diye ağlaşmaktadır hatta ne haddineyse "islamın geleceği" kitapçığında birrlik yerine müslümanların kendi küçük cumhuriyetleri ve demokrasileri falan olmalıdır der , sonra malum bu masonlar ittihat terakkiyi falan kurarlar devamen de meşrutiyetçi delileri yanlarına alırlar ,,, bunların günümüzdeki uzantıları da bugünde taliban el kaide ikilisine gak guk etmeyi pek severler özellikle abd dolaylarından ...
 
Durum
Üzgünüz bu konu cevaplar için kapatılmıştır...
Üst Ana Sayfa Alt